Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 41,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2021, 12:07 pm
Interesting developments in G 1/21! [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
Doe 3-5-2003 Question: Does the Ex Post Facto Clause of Article I Section 10 prohibit the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act's registration requirement as a retroactive punishment? [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:52 pm
A domestic violence hearing is usually held within only ten (10) days of the filing of an ex parte complaint and temporary restraining order. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 5:45 pm
No APC but does charge page fees. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:14 pm
If the court makes a finding of a gross and patent abuse of prosecutorial discretion and imposes a sentence of special probation notwithstanding the objection of the prosecutor, the sentence of special probation imposed pursuant to this section shall not become final for 10 days in order to permit the appeal of such sentence by the prosecution.d. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 8:20 am
The written description specifically refers to Figure 4 when describing Figures 1, 2, and 5, and the binding illustrated in Figure 4 is the only binding that can be considered "previously described. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm
It appears that it does. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:49 pm
It appears that it does. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:00 pm
Nesson is now saying he'd like to file his opposition to the motion 10 days after Judge Gertner does what the plaintiffs have asked her to do. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:59 pm
The High Court's String of Unanimous Decisions - The blogging constitutionalists at the American Constitution Society in their ACS Blog Fumo Trial Post 10: What Does The Defense Have To Prove? [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:16 pm
Philly Channel 10 on Feb. 20 discussed a recent EEOC ruling which allows employers to create two classes of employees, thereby curtailing expected health benefits for some. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:06 pm
The same report notes that thieves are targeting Tide because: (1) it is one of the most popular brands and is easily recognizable for consumers, (2) it cannot be tracked because it does not have a serial number, and (3) a $10-$20 bottle can still go for $5 – $10 on the streets (Yahoo! [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:01 am
(Click image to enlarge) As it does with lawyers, Avvo is rating doctors on a scale of 1-to-10 and providing a variety of information about each doctor’s practice and disciplinary history. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 5:09 am
But what does “provide” mean? [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:38 am
., 1-10-cv-21785 (FLSD November 17, 2010, Report & Recommendations) (Turnoff, M.J.)Length of Time Since Patent Expired Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' qui tam false marking action for failing to plead with particularity was granted. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:50 am
It takes time (estimated as 52 posts or 1-2 years) before a blog will generate business, but when it does, it pays off. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:06 pm
Who qualifies as an employee and who is an independent contractor, how to avoid discrimination claims and what to do when you are forced to discipline or terminate an employee - these are the themes this week.Here's a description of my aspect of it: Optional Materials:The Importance of having an employment handbook for your organization.Interview with Charles Krugel, Employment Law Attorney and Consultant. (10 min.)What does "Employment-at-Will" really mean? [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:04 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court announced it will issue tomorrow, April 12, at 10:00 a.m., the Court's long awaited decision.We expect the Court's decision will address at least two major issues: (1) whether an employer's obligation to "provide" required meal periods means to make required meal periods available to eligible employees (i.e., non-exempt employees) or to ensure that eligible employees take all required meal periods, and (2)… [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 10:09 am
OBSERVATION 1 The workmanship of equipment does not allow proper cleaning. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:04 am
In the dependent spouse does remarry, he or she becomes ineligible for derivative benefits from a former spouse. [read post]
