Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 9,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2024, 12:32 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
The court stated in its judgment that DMG relied in particular on Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75.In Jameel Lord Phillips MR stated [at 54]:“An abuse of process is of concern not merely to the parties but to the court. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
English common law liability cases were governed by a somewhat confusing triad of duties. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after a public hearing are outstanding: Bindel v PinkNews Media Group Ltd, heard 26 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Lloyd v Google, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 (UKSC) Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon, heard 21-23 and 26 April 2021 (Nicklin J) Kumlin v Jonsson, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Serra v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Smith English only Environment Environment Environmental justice epidemics Epperson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
The notice must be in writing in both English and Spanish and must recite the statutory language verbatim. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ RightsNoudehouenou v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The ED considered claim 1 of the main request (request A) to lack novelty over D1.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board (request F) read (in English translation):A strip (1) made from biocompatible material for a use in the treatment of female urinary incontinence, wherein the treatment comprises the following steps:Making a median paraurethral (paraurétale) incision essentially at the level of the middle third (tiers moyen) of the urethra measured from the meatus such as to… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:33 am
In answer to my own not so jocular question in the title, the answer is, I truely don't know..So the long awaited decision in Newzbin 2 aka Twentieth Century Fox et al v BT [2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch) is out. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
This is provided by a lesser English club, Ebbsfleet United. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm
Kammen cites Cuyler v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Furthermore, the result of the decision in Thornton v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
"Oyez" is sort of an old English tradition. [read post]
13 May 2013, 2:56 am
The title of this post is a riff on English playwright Brian Clark’s play Whose Life Is It Anyway? [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
” Steele v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Claire referred to the HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 and Actavis v Lilly [2015] EWHC 3294 (Pat) cases as examples of patents which did not have data in them and yet were found to be plausible. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The decision by Justice O’Donnell in R. v. [read post]
