Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2012, 4:50 pm
Scandalising the court has been defined as 'any act done or writing published calculated to bring a Court or a judge of the Court into contempt, or to lower his authority' (R v Gray [1900] 2 QB 36, 40, by Lord Russell of Killowen CJ). [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
The Court will hold a hearing on the case of Fisher v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm
Despite the fact that these messages are scripted and articulated by government spokespeople pursuant to a set translation, to "pure" English speakers like me, the translated statements are often very unclear and/or make little sense in English. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:05 am
The case is Chafin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:23 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Family Opinions Body: AC32664 - Langley v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:43 am
Hired under a three-year probationary contract, the high school English teacher was assigned to a magnet academy his first year. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:30 am
” Recently, in Schilf v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 11:00 pm
August 8, 2012 Rosalind English Filed under: Roundup [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
That is the issue which the English Court of Appeal recently faced in VTB Capital Plc v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:22 pm
The case is Native Village of Eyak v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:52 am
The style of the case is, Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
Participants were English speakers using Mechanical Turk. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:26 am
"The law of executions," is at Al Jazeera English. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:33 am
See Sistem v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The defendant will claim the onus is on the plaintiff, who lives in the United States, filed a claim in the United States and intends to testify, presumably in English or through her own translator, at the eventual trial. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:00 am
In ENER-G Holdings plc v Hormell, the Court of Appeal (Longmore, LJ dissenting) held that it is. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
But in constitutional or personal injury law, a disputant is likely to occupy only side of the "v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:13 am
For numerous reasons, this is a big deal—maybe the biggest Korea v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
Use plain English to the extent possible, rather than legal jargon. [read post]
