Search for: "IN RE GUESS"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 16,480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2013, 3:19 pm
My bet is that Mayor Cason will be re-elected. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:32 pm
I guess now we’ll see. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
There’s also a “best evidence rule” argument, but we’re not quarrelling with that. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:07 am
So, in part to save Bexis from having to address these with many others in his roundup, we re-enter the blogging fray with a post that attempts to tie together these decisions in something somewhat coherent. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 4:55 am
The song was re-created by a sound-alike group with assistance from George Martin. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
As many readers already guessed, the answer is more complex than yes or no. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:32 am
This could have been an April Fool’s Day prank, but we’re guessing it wasn’t.To get ourselves oriented here, let’s all agree that the FCC’s decades-long effort to regulate “indecency” is a Big Deal in communications jurisprudence. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Its original opinion was In re Whirlpool Corp. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 10:08 pm
We’re just sayin’ . . . [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 9:43 pm
By Daniel RichardsonIn re Chandler, 2013 VT 10 Today’s case is like that little house at the end of the lane. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:34 am
I guess it's just that this is a huge case and the devil is in the details, including the detail that the jury awarded only 40% of the Daubert-surviving claims. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:15 am
This causes harm but—you guessed it—the harm falls outside the organization, so there isn’t much incentive to check. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
As federal courts may not re-evaluate an FDA regulatory decision that a device requires PMA in the administrative context, we would argue that a fortiori courts applying state law should not engage in similar second-guessing in product liability litigation.A second aspect of Cytori is also potentially useful. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:00 pm
We’re better than that. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:18 am
[Indeed, one could also argue that the 2009 MCA, which re-enacts the CMCR's appellate jurisdiction with some minor changes, supersedes the 2006 MCA, which enacted the jurisdiction-stripping provision.] [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:00 pm
” So I guess that with his $25MM payroll and his $80MM from the Astros television network contract, Brother Crane sure will not be losing any money. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 8:37 am
Just because we’re putting in these facilities doesn’t mean that bicyclists have to stay in that facility. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 2:35 pm
If you’re looking to make a quick buck (or a quick $10 million bucks), the State Department has placed a bounty on the heads of Omar Hammami and Jehad Serwan Mostafa says the Washington Times. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
They're saying, we’re not saying you should have a different structure, we're not saying anything about warning; we’re saying if you do this, [sell the product] you’re going to have to pay for the damage. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:08 pm
(I’m not, but I guess I should say it.) [read post]
