Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL" Results 7061 - 7080 of 15,749
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
No Re-Verifying Current Employees  Refrain from re-verifying the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by the employment eligibility verification provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 USC § 1324a(b), or that would violate any E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding the employer has entered into with the Department of Homeland Security. * * * To be sure, AB 450 offers sops feigning fealty to federal… [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
No Re-Verifying Current Employees  Refrain from re-verifying the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by the employment eligibility verification provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 USC § 1324a(b), or would violate any E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding the employer has entered into with the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 1:56 pm by Jeremy M. Klang
Consider giving the employee the opportunity to ask questions, to negotiate the consideration they’re receiving, encourage them to speak to legal counsel, and don’t threaten any negative consequences regarding their employment for their failure to sign. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 1:56 pm by Jeremy M. Klang
Consider giving the employee the opportunity to ask questions, to negotiate the consideration they’re receiving, encourage them to speak to legal counsel, and don’t threaten any negative consequences regarding their employment for their failure to sign. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am by Chris Mirasola
Pradhan cited a memo by State Department Legal Advisor Harold Koh stating that certain UNCAT provisions codify an existing international obligation against the use of torture by providing more specific means to prevent, prosecute, and remedy violations. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 9:47 am by Jeff Rasansky
If we feel as though you have a strong case, we’ll explain the legal options available to you moving forward. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
 The state was a corrupt racist oligarchy, so secure in its control that it did not need Klan violence, using cleverly designed legal rules to hold down both taxes and voter participation. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 pm by Kluwer UPC News blogger
‘If the Federal Constitutional Court rules a complaint is justified, it must of course indicate how the contested legal foundations, including the EPC, should be amended. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:22 am by David M. Ward
Some of my success came from improving my legal skills. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
“The Commission will continue exchanges and dialogues with online platforms and other relevant stakeholders. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
“The Commission will continue exchanges and dialogues with online platforms and other relevant stakeholders. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
This rather lenient standard for bringing a civil action reflects the important public policy of avoiding the chilling of novel or debatable legal claims. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
In other words, it’s what the putative co-owners do in furtherance of a profit-seeking business — rather than what they think or say they’re doing — that evidences intent and determines the existence of a partnership. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:45 am
That’s why we’re standing up for trans students in Frederick County, and we will continue to stand up for trans youth wherever they are being targeted. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 9:39 am by CJ Haddick
  The decision – making process must not only  be a thorough one;  it must be one where the reasoning behind it is documented so that it is re-traceable at a later time . [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:55 am by Sergio F. Oehninger
” That conclusion is at odds with the general rule that any ambiguities should be resolved in favor of the insured. [read post]