Search for: "JOHN DOE, 2" Results 7061 - 7080 of 13,842
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2014, 12:10 pm by Ritika Singh
Against the backdrop of these changes, does the United States need more reform to its surveillance authorities? [read post]
28 May 2014, 10:56 am by Yvonne McDermott
Yvonne McDermott (Bangor University), ‘(Re-)Assessing Findings of Fact on Appeal: When does the ‘Only Reasonable Conclusion’ become Unreasonable? [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Tort law does not provide compensation for all stress-causing and nasty conduct that individuals may suffer at the hands of another…” 2. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:50 pm by admin
May 27, 2014 Guest post: John Bodrug & George Addy (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP) (Reprinted with permission) On May 23, 2014, Nazir Karigar was sentenced to three years in prison for agreeing, in his capacity as an agent of a Canadian business, to offer bribes to Air India officials and India’s then Minister of Civil Aviation in relation to a bid for a security contract. [read post]
27 May 2014, 2:39 pm
In this latest batch of lawsuits filed by copyright lawyer Paul Nicoletti, the 14 defendants, all sued under the name "John Doe" until they can be identified pursuant to a court subpoena and named, are listed as "persistent online infringer[s]" of Malibu Media's copyrighted works. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:04 pm by Patent Docs
Arner of Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner; John J. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:08 pm
Category: Claim Construction      By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor TitleShire Development, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 1:40 pm
In part because of Earl Warren’s desire to achieve unanimity, the Brown opinion does not actually overrule Plessy v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:51 am
" It claims that "John Doe" has infringed 30 separate copyrighted works owned by Malibu Media. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
                                                                  II. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Their position requires that they be “held to higher standards of integrity and ethical conduct than attorneys or other persons not invested With the public trust”.[89] To ensure that the public does not lose confidence in the judicial system, a delicate balance is required to maintain a degree of judicial insulation from society so that judges remain impartial arbitrators While at the same time allowing them to be active members of the community. [read post]