Search for: "People v. To"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 73,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 7:09 am
That appears to be the case in Bridge v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 10:41 am
Because I continue to adhere to the Confrontation Clause that the People adopted, as described in Crawford v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
In its recent controversial decision in Halbig v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:31 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:17 am
People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:15 am
People v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:33 am
I am sure that the Blogosphere will be blogging about this op-ed by Judge Morris Hoffman, who conducted an empirical study which analyzed sentences handed out to people represented by public defenders v. privately retained counsel. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:38 am
Sharps v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
The Court confirmed that the trial judge was correct to hold that such allegations would tend to have a substantial adverse effect (Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) [98]) on the way that people would treat Mr Millet. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:32 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:09 pm
The case of Serafin v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 2:13 pm
There are plenty of people in this world who hate insurance companies. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Key Statute and Precedent State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:28 pm
In INS v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm
Google (for Google) and FTC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am
In R.S. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:59 pm
Pratt v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
People v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
It is well-established that a private entity has an ability to make “choices about whether, to what extent, and in what manner it will disseminate speech…” NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
