Search for: "Price v Price"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 18,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
Supreme Court’s March 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
(E.g., People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
And, most importantly, she checked the Apple site, which gives up-to-date information on used computers as to what the price would be. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 5:05 pm
By Eric Goldman New Mexico v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in SFFA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:18 am
by Roger Alford That’s the question, sort of, raised in Totes-Isotoner v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 1:16 am
Hyundai Motor Am. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
Clancy, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:30 pm
Glazer v. [read post]
19 May 2005, 3:43 pm
Fellow PRACDL member Linda Backiel just won a new trial for her client in US v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:51 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:51 pm
Papaiyawala v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 4:52 am
Barkley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:56 am
I have excerpted a portion of the Kappos post that he titles “Increased Fees v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:53 am
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:15 am
Late last week, a federal jury came back with their verdict in the case of the United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 12:41 pm
Facts: This case (Edmark Auto, Inc. et al v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 5:37 am
On this basis, the market (and insured) value of a finished good would be much higher than the market value of the equivalent unfinished good.However, the judge found that the correspondence between the parties and the insured's commercial objectives on placing the insurance implied that the "Invoice Value" should be interpreted as the retail price at which CMT sold on the finished goods to its customers. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:59 am
Facts: This case (Jones et al v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:20 pm
On June 1, 2015, a California Court of Appeal held that in order for a lease-leaseback arrangement to be enforceable, the lease must be “genuine”, containing both a financing component and a lease term that extends beyond the construction period (Davis v. [read post]
