Search for: "Reproductive Rights"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 8,491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2012, 9:54 pm
” The plaintiffs sued YouTube and Google, alleging “direct and secondary copyright infringement based on the public performance, display, and reproduction of approximately 79,000 audiovisual ‘clips’ that appeared on the YouTube website between 2005 and 2008. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm
As Lewison writes: The political implications here are obvious: caving to the anti-choice right would be a huge let down to everyone who cares about reproductive freedom and access to birth control. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 11:42 pm
Broadcasters can defend themselves, but it is clear that they already pay millions in copyright fees and the additional payment for mechanical reproduction has long been a controversial and contentious extra fee. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
The petition for review is based on an alleged violation of the right to be heard. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 2:15 pm
Whatever that cause happens to be: criminal justice, textualism, racial equality, the separation of powers, reproductive rights, originalism, economic fairness, etc. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
But then judicial supremacy roared right back in other areas, such as free speech, equal protection, criminal procedure, reproductive rights, and more. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
That’s right: students must be proficient in a body of law that does not govern them. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:56 pm
However, the first sale doctrine only applies to distribution rights—it doesn’t cover reproduction rights. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:35 am
Temporary acts of reproduction referred to in Article 2, which are transient or incidental [and] an integral and essential part of a technological process and whose sole purpose is to enable: (a) a transmission in a network between third parties by an intermediary, or (b) a lawful use of a work or other subject-matter to be made, and which have no independent economic significance, shall be exempted from the reproduction right provided for in Article 2. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 am
(6) Where a person has the right to use a copy of the First Program under a licence, is Article 5(3) [of Directive 91/250] to be interpreted as meaning that the licensee is entitled, without the authorisation of the rightholder, to perform acts of loading, running and storing the program in order to observe, test or study the functioning of the First Program so as to determine the ideas and principles which underlie any element of the program, if the licence permits the licensee to perform… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:46 pm
As an attorney with the reproductive rights project at the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) at the time, with little experience in technology and privacy, I was tasked with identifying the privacy implications for reproductive health care in this new paradigm, but I realized quickly that the system posed serious threats to patient privacy writ large. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:11 pm
There is no evidence that Defendants stood to profit in any manner from their reproduction of Plaintiff’s listserv post, let alone evidence that they intended to commercially exploit it. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Not discussed is whether myVidster could be held vicariously liable for infringement — if it benefitted financially from infringement that it had a right and ability to control — a claim that, again, was alleged in the complaint but not argued for in the injunction. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
He thus expressed reservations about Griswold and then wrote a savage attack on Roe even though he supported reproductive choice politically. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:11 pm
Substantive due process occupies far more of our national debate because it touches upon the perennial obsessions about reproductive rights and homosexuality. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Second, there may be upper-level classes on Reproductive Rights, which often tend—at least from the syllabi we reviewed—to focus on policy and implementation rather than first principles. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 9:49 am
But “wrong” means that there is a “right”—a verifiable, objective reality. [read post]
21 Sep 2024, 5:00 pm
Each talk for 10 minutes with 15 minutes for small group discussion. [8 papers]Table 1: Moderator: Kimberly Vargas Barreto, “The Agapean framework”Bharat Ranganathan, “Is there a human right to health(care)? [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am
Below is a reproduction from the complaint, but it doesn't really do them justice. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
Since religious freedom under Article 25 is subject to ‘other provisions of [Part III on fundamental rights]’, how do we understand the exclusionary rule in the light of the fundamental right against sex discrimination under Article 15(1)? [read post]
