Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS" Results 7061 - 7080 of 7,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am by jonathanturley
” Justice Stevens offered a more limited dissent in calling for a remand to consider the study further. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed their convictions.Writing for the Court in Kelly v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Reich, written by Judge Morris Arnold and joined by Judge Steven Colloton, considered "whether [Missouri state representative Cheri Toalson] Reisch acted under color of state law when she blocked [Mike] Campbell on Twitter. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:04 am
But what was not similarly clear in the hearing on District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
United States, 137 U. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Here is a great position paper/study by a Forensic Psychologist, named Steven J. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At OurFuture.org, Sam Pizzigati argues that in Janus v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am by admin
Most recently in 2010, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, even Supreme Court justices who believe that the government may not endorse religion think that it’s fine for government officials to express religious views in their speeches — here, for instance, is the view of Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Van Orden v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:14 am by Danielle Citron
 Questions about the Court’s contemporary recusal practice date back to Chief Justice Rehnquist’s decision to participate in the Laird v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” The 1969 Supreme Court decision in Powell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]