Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 21,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 7:20 am
Maloney v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 5:03 am
A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
With respect to design patent damages in Apple v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court clarified the burden a shareholder must meet to obtain corporate records under chapter 156D, section 16.02(b) last week inUsing a Russian proverb, an analog to a well-known Biblical verse, and a biting observation about the underlying litigation, the Court added some color to the somewhat mundane topic of statutory shareholder inspection rights.Ultimately, the Court held that (1) the trial court, which had applied a standard derived from Delaware law to the inspection… [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court clarified the burden a shareholder must meet to obtain corporate records under chapter 156D, section 16.02(b) last week in Using a Russian proverb, an analog to a well-known Biblical verse, and a biting observation about the underlying litigation, the Court added some color to the somewhat mundane topic of statutory shareholder inspection rights.Ultimately, the Court held that (1) the trial court, which had applied a standard derived from Delaware law to the inspection… [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court clarified the burden a shareholder must meet to obtain corporate records under chapter 156D, section 16.02(b) last week in Using a Russian proverb, an analog to a well-known Biblical verse, and a biting observation about the underlying litigation, the Court added some color to the somewhat mundane topic of statutory shareholder inspection rights.Ultimately, the Court held that (1) the trial court, which had applied a standard derived from Delaware law to the inspection… [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
Hopkins and Oncale v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:29 am
” Both are governed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure as well as local rules, state statutes, and court precedent. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:45 am
In Durling, et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am
Aptos Council v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
In Durrell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 8:20 am
Rule 504 provides an exemption for offers and sales of securities that are conducted according to state law exemptions from registration that permit general solicitation and advertising, so long as sales are only made to accredited investors. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:48 am
Casey, the Supreme Court famously replaced Roe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
State, supra(quoting Bond v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:37 am
The court also rejected the employee’s allegation that he faced reprisal for taking leave (Alwood v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 10:23 pm
Diesel v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:08 pm
But in Dolemba v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
In a recent decision, Ramirez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
In a recent decision, Ramirez v. [read post]
