Search for: "State v. Little" Results 7061 - 7080 of 23,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
It has been a little over seven years since 15-year-old Sergio Hernandez was shot by Jesus Mesa, a U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
” Recent Maryland Case Offers Guidance Filling the void, along comes a recent decision by the Appellate Court of Maryland — that state’s intermediate appellate court — in Mekhaya v Eastland Food Corp. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm by Anna Christensen
Petitioner and its amici cite early substantive due process cases and Hughes, but there is little other relevant caselaw. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:45 am by J
Such is the state of the NL backlog that I’m only getting to it now. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Wednesday’s oral arguments in oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:45 am by Ryan McKeen
Most states simply require a law license and some no license at all. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
North Carolina and Johnson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm by Larry
The background to Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Wrote a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department court in reinstating Chontay Kirby’s first and only cause of action for discrimination in her 11-page complaint, “Although plaintiff’s first cause of action is labeled as one for ‘hostile workplace,’” the lower court “was not bound by that designation and plaintiff has sufficiently stated a cause of action for employment discrimination under both the New York State… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Rory Little weighs in on last week’s oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm by Stefan Passantino
  Back in April, this blog boldly predicted that the United States Supreme Court would exert little effort in dismissing the State of Montana’s effort to convince us that the Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]