Search for: "State v. Stephens."
Results 7061 - 7080
of 7,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
January 9, 2009 PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM OF THE JUSTICE ROBERT H. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
In July of 2007, I was the attorney for the defendant in the divorce of Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm
" And so, "absent agreement or other definitive obligation, this State, as opposed to some others does not hold a child liable for the support of his or her parent. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
[Is the United States scaleable? [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
[After two days of hero worship for Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Gorsuch, day three dumps on the Junior Justice.] [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:56 pm
Air Products and Chemicals Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Over the last few months, we here at Abnormal Use have corresponded regularly with our friends at the Drug and Device Law blog, most notably Steve McConnell and Jim Beck, about both the law and popular culture. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
In a split decision written by Judge Stephen Powell, and joined by Judge Ringland, the Twelfth District Court of Appeals affirmed. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:21 pm
Yes, Nate Silver or Stephen Smith could be your office mates but chances are they’re not. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am
Dear ColleaguesI hope you find useful to have the links to the new issue of OPINIO JURIS in COMPARATIONE. once again we look forward to host contribution from our Juris Diversitatis group.If you have problems to read the post, please let me know.With my bestsciaoGiovanni #ssrnholder { font-face: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; } #ssrnholder #outline{ border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; border-color: #003366; max-width: 700px; } #ssrnholder table{ max-width: 700px;} #ssrnholder… [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
bit.ly/zpfcer (Elkan Abramowitz, Barry Bohrer) Reports and Resources Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal and Private Sector (PDF) 1.usa.gov/yzxOby (Homeland Security) comScore Releases February 2012 U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am
The fourth quarter of 2011 also saw some very large leveraged buyout transactions in the United States which bodes well for the higher end of the market in Canada, which transactions we have not seen domestically for several years. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
http://bit.ly/MtGmqK (Ralph Losey) Cloud Data Protection Offerings for eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/PDVUJj (Stephen Arnold) Computers Conquer Connect Four; Predictive Coding Next? [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
9:00 a.m. sesstion: Culture, Tradition and Language in Cross-Border Negotiations and International Conflict presented by Professor John Barkai, University of Hawaii; Andrew Aglionby, Baker & McKenzie; and, Michael Zacharia, Former Exec. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
Stated otherwise, not only do compelled speech objections to directives about pronouns and titles largely sidestep the reality that courtrooms are already places of highly regulated speech, they are also taken up by some to disguise an underlying discriminatory ideology. [read post]
