Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 16,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2015, 5:21 pm
Canton v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
Texas, 539 U.S. 588 (2003) (criminalization of same sex sexual conduct is unconstitutional), United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
Given the strong showing of obviousness, we find that the evidence of secondary considerations was inadequate to overcome the legal conclusion that the contested claims would have been obvious. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:00 am
Earlier this year, the Virginia Supreme Court decided Martin Brothers Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:45 pm
We just spoke to Thelen's co-chair, Stephen V. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 6:23 am
Cooper of The University of Utah, Huseyin Gulen of Purdue University, and Alexei V. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:57 am
Kennedy referred in Roper v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
The 2008 strong Democratic mandate has not evaporated. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 8:53 am
" The Yakama v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:59 am
The case is Williamson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 1:37 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision that overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:43 am
The woman's privacy interest is so strong that it defeats the state's interest in potential life until the moment of viability. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm
The decision, reached by the Court in a summary ruling without briefs or a hearing, featured a strong complaint by two Justices that the Court was tampering with strict limits that Congress had put on state inmates’ access to federal habeas courts. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:30 pm
In Part 2 I began looking at Universal Music Group v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:30 am
" In exploring the meaning of the terms, the article notes it breadth, as articulated by Section 1 author John Bingham (R-Ohio) and Justice Strong in West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:02 pm
Nestle v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:39 am
United States, 459 F.3d 220 (2d Cir. 2006) (better known as “Castle Harbour“) and the Fourth Circuit’s holding in Virginia Historic Tax Credit Fund LLC 2001 v. [read post]
