Search for: "U. S. v. Mays"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 7,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2008, 7:38 am
Arch's disclaimer letter dated May 12, 2005 was effective as against Pav-Lak because Pav-Lak received a copy of it (see Schlott v Transcontinental Ins. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 4:23 pm
That's less than the 5 percent to 10 percent increases firms made in recent years when the economy was strong. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
S. 423, 441 (1974); O’Shea v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:12 pm
Employer's GML Section 207-a disability determination not controlled by retirement system's approving employee's disability retirement applicationMatter of Solano v City of Mount Vernon, 2007 NY Slip Op 52573(U), Supreme Court, Westchester County [Not published in the Official Reports], affirmed, 49 A.D.3d 762Dennis M. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:47 am
U. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:51 pm
She was driving in, not through, the crosswalk, in the course of completing a U-turn, looking for a parking space. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
2) If so, how important is the food product as a source of the nutrient(s) in the overall diet? [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:53 pm
PLLC v Motor Veh. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 3:59 pm
NO-FAULT - FORM OF ATTORNEY'S AFFIRMATION - CPLR ARTICLE 75 SPECIAL PROCEEDING TO VACATE MASTER ARBITRATION AWARDValentin Avanessov, Physician, PC a/a/o Azra Sabovic v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 11:20 am
Sanctions ordered after lawsuit filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law ruled frivolousMatter of Fenstermaker v Edgemont Union Free School Dist., 2006 NY Slip Op 52652(U), Decided on September 26, 2006, Supreme Court, Westchester County, Loehr, J. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
Distributions provided for by the governing instrument may be made from one or more of the separate trusts; s. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:48 pm
U-Haul Co. of California (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 796; Aguiar v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
Not later than ten days after receipt of the hearing officer's decision [emphasis supplied], the employee or the employing board may make an application to the New York state supreme court to vacate or modify the decision of the hearing officer pursuant to section seven thousand five hundred eleven of the civil practice law and rules. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 7:25 pm
Donnelly and Allegheny v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
Duty to defend and indemnify an employee being sued triggered by allegations of misconduct related to the performance of official dutiesDreyer v City of Saratoga Springs, 2006 NY Slip Op 52618(U), Supreme Court, Saratoga County, Nolan, J. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
Co., 15 Misc 3d 126[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 50500[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2007]). [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 12:02 am
In Quon v. [read post]