Search for: "mark"
Results 7061 - 7080
of 135,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 2:49 am
," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark MUZZYS in stylized form (second below) for "clothing, namely hats, shirts and jackets," and for "retail store ... featuring motorcycle parts and clothing manufactured by others. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
" series of decisions, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark AT C-LEVEL for "magazines featuring economic information specific to municipalities" on the ground that the mark depicted in the drawing is not a substantially exact representation of the mark shown in Applicant's specimens of use, as required by Rule 2.41(a). [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 8:20 am
"Since these marks are in different indusries (finance vs. cafes), why can this be? [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:25 am
The Examining Attorney maintained that the mark was likely to cause confusion with the mark depicted immediately below, for "women’s dresses, shirts, skirts and apparel. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:41 am
The identity of the marks weighed heavily in favor of the refusal. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 11:18 am
Dior accused TRAB of procedural violation based on that the key feature of the mark had been obviously missed during the review procedure: the disputed mark had been mistakenly reviewed as a 2D graphic mark, disregarding the explicit information of “3D mark” contained in the application and in the public Madrid Monitor record. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 2:13 pm
But Cruz’s speeches are marked by what you might call pagan brutalism. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:43 am
We will wait and see, but it does seem once again that Mark's conclusion is right on the money. [read post]
Precedential No. 18: Invoking 13th duPont Factor, TTAB Reverses 2(d) Refusal of ANYWEAR for Footwear
9 Apr 2012, 3:05 am
How about adding an "S" to the mark DUMBAS? [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:17 am
" Moreover, the word "classic" appears in more than one hundred registrations for marks for golf tournaments, and thus, in the cited mark, denotes a golf tournament.The Board agreed that "Trinity" is the strongest source-identifying term in both marks, but "the design features of these marks cannot be dismissed quite as easily as the Trademark Attorney has done. [read post]
31 May 2018, 1:35 pm
” Moreover, the Board found that the Opposer’s INDUSTRY mark was weak, reasoning that: the weaker an opposer’s mark, the closer an applicant’s mark can come without causing a likelihood of confusion and thereby invading what amounts to its comparatively narrower range of protection. [read post]
DISTRACTION: So, yesterday reader John Mark Williams suggested that the Colbert testimony was inten…
24 Sep 2010, 9:19 am
MORE: Reader Mark Linder writes: You and John Mark Williams are right to suppose that the administration and its supporters are much happier with people talking about Colbert and not Coates. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:32 pm
Terms to be Aware of When Registering a Trademark To qualify for a mark in Iowa, the proposed mark must already be in use. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:14 am
The Board focused on opposer's registered mark THE BEAUTY CHANNEL as the mark most similar to applicant's mark, noting that if confusion is not likely as to that mark, then there is no need to consider the other two registered marks (BEAUTY EVERYWHERE and SYNCHRONIZING BEAUTY).The Board first found that applicant's services (providing information about beauty) encompassed those of opposer. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 5:46 am
Armani invoked a likelihood of confusion (Art. 8(1)(b) EUTMR) with its trade mark’s goods in class 9 and asserted an infringement of its trade mark with a reputation for the goods in class 25 of its earlier mark (Art. 8(5) EUTMR). [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 4:56 am
And the design element of the cited mark is large and noticeable, further distinguishing the marks. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 8:23 am
Its evidence shows an intent to continue use of other marks, such as EPICURE or JERRY’S FAMOUS DELI, but not the RASCAL HOUSE marks. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
Finally, the Board observed that the refusal to register does not affect applicant's right to use the subject mark, but only his right to register.This case is solely about whether the applicant may 'call upon the resources of the federal government' to obtain federal registration of the mark on the Principal Register in order to assist in enforcement of the mark. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:14 am
Although Applicant sought to register the mark for vehicle accessories, it did so based upon an alleged bona fide intent to use the mark in connection with those goods, and the Board found no evidence that the design had been used or registered in connection with any other goods or services. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:26 am
Turning to the issue of the similarity or dissimilarity between the marks, the Board observed that [w]hile the marks have some obvious differences in sight and sound, they all end with the term SPADE/S. [read post]
