Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 7081 - 7100 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
 Yet, it is important to keep in mind that such claim changes are not effective until the proceeding is concluded.This past Monday in Keung Tse v. eBay, Inc., et al (CAND), the Court considered whether cancellation/amendment  of a claim during patent reexamination mooted an otherwise justiciable dispute, explaining: Only claim 21 of United States patent number 6,665,797 is asserted in this action. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm by Bexis
FCC, 512 U.S. 622, (1994); United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:52 am by scanner1
RIVERSIDE CONTRACTING, INC., a Montana corporation; UNITED RENTAL HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., n/k/a HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Massachusetts corporation; THE STATE OF MONTANA, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; and CARTER & BURGESS, INC., a Texas corporation, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
Tuesday, Oct. 4 Brad Seligman, JD, civil rights attorney specializing in class action and individual employment and civil rights litigation, will present “What Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
Instrumentation & Diagnostics Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:39 am by Andrew Frisch
Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 710 F.2d 678, 690 (11th Cir.1983) (“A federal court applying state law is bound to adhere to decisions of the state’s intermediate appellate courts absent some persuasive indication that the state’s highest court would decide the issue otherwise. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am by Gregory Dell
Long Term Disability Plan in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit joined the Ninth Circuit in holding Aug. 15 that an importer of a copyrighted work manufactured overseas for resale in the United States cannot use the first sale doctrine as a defense to infringement (John Wiley & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:44 am
 Beginning in July, the law firm Bursor & Fisher P.A. began an effort to thwart the merger by using AT&T’s own arbitration agreements against it – the same arbitration agreements that were at the center of the United States Supreme Court’s recent, and well publicized, decision AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]