Search for: "BANKS V. STATE" Results 7081 - 7100 of 15,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am by Vipul Kapoor, Olswang LLP
Nevertheless, it discussed at length the question of indivisibility in a property purchase/bank loan context, as noted above. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:01 am by Hanibal Goitom
Daniel Roque Vítolo, How to Deal with Foreign and “Off-shore” Companies in Argentina (2004). [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am by Maureen Johnston
Hyde Park Savings Bank 14-116Issue: Whether an order denying confirmation of a bankruptcy plan is appealable. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
United States, a North Carolina man’s challenge to his conviction under a provision of the federal bank robbery statute that imposes a minimum sentence of ten years when the defendant forces another person to accompany him in connection with the robbery. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Carlyle, heard 20 November 2014. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v, National Australia Bank – which held that the U.S. securities laws do not apply to securities transactions that take place outside the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 7:30 am by Gene Quinn
This seemed to culminate in the 1998 ruling of the Federal Circuit in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
A BUSINESSMAN has been ordered to hand over £6.5 million to his former employers after falsely claiming via a Doctor’s Soul & Conscience letter that he was suffering from depression to avoid appearing in court.Paul McKenzie sent the document, known in Scots Law as a soul and conscious certificate, to a judge at the Court of Session in Edinburgh after being being sued for breaking the terms of a severance package.Mr McKenzie had sold his debt collection agency Mackenzie Hall Holdings… [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]