Search for: "Case v. Case"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 291,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Messmore v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 9:52 am
Baker is not the big patent case; that one is Impression Products v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:19 pm
Cases provided courtesy of Lexis. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:44 pm
In many cases the suppression ( or lack thereof) of the Alcotest results will mean the difference between 3 months and 1 year loss of license, or no license suspension at all, ignition interlock v no interlock, registration suspension, higher fines, guilty v not guilty, etc. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 1:25 am
That brings us to the Wisconsin Supreme Court's recent decision Luckett v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:10 am
Here's the abstract: This chapter in the Law and Religion volume of Aspen's forthcoming "Cases in Context" series traces the background and implications of Lemon v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
Olson decisions, and the case's legacy. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:28 am
The case was Wallace v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:20 pm
The case involves the [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 11:29 am
Jurisdiction is the power of a Court to hear a case, and/or enforce the law. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:06 am
This Equal Pay Act case comes back to life after the Court of Appeals agrees with a pro se plaintiff that she has a claim for unfair treatment because of her gender.The case is Chepak v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 6:14 am
And if all else fails, the police officers are immune from suit if the court finds the arrest was objectively reasonable, even if was a bad arrest in hindsight.The case is Iocovello v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:24 am
In Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 4:46 am
The final case, Kemp v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 9:34 am
A recent Texas Supreme Court decision on pipeline eminent domain, Hlavinka v. [read post]
Richardson v Richardson: Cases in which a Barder event can be successfully argued are extremely rare
8 Feb 2011, 9:18 am
In Richardson v Richardson [2011] EWCA Civ 79, decided today, the husband appealed against a final ancillary relief order on the basis of subsequent events.The order was made on 25 September 2009, dividing the matrimonial assets as to 47.5% to the wife and 52.5% to the husband. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:53 am
[State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:00 am
In the first case, Cisson, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:27 am
The case deals with unjust enrichment. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 3:45 pm
The Supreme Court's Lance v. [read post]
