Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 7081 - 7100 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2019, 9:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Aug. 20, 2019)Stouffer, who (with his coplaintiff production company and his brother, who is not a plaintiff) produced the Wild America nature documentary series, sued National Geographic for trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and unfair competition for its “Wild” productions. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Design sells the product; Samsung sales went up 20% after copying Apple’s product. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:17 am by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 12:57 pm by Ann Pearson
But let’s say your client does actually pay a .1 to draft a deposition notice. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Raquel Leslie, Brian Liu
Chinese Ride-Hailing Giant DiDi Lays Off 20 Percent of Employees  Reports broke on Feb. 14 that Chinese ride-hailing giant DiDi plans to lay off about 20 percent of its employees amid ongoing regulatory scrutiny into the company. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
That was almost 20 years ago, but Arizona courts still follow the rule. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:17 pm by centerforartlaw
In fact, one does not need in-depth research to be suspicious about some of her antiquities. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:39 am
Indeed, were it not implicit, OHIM would scarcely have renounced its hard-defended 4/03 the day after the Court’s judgment. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:54 pm
Telephone technology does not create a captive audience like radio. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:05 am by Eugene Volokh
" … [D]efamation by implication arises from what is implied when a defendant "(1) juxtaposes a series of facts so as to imply a defamatory connection between them, or (2) creates a defamatory implication by omitting facts. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:54 am by Richard Hunt
A poorly designed website may be hard to use for non-disabled users; does that mean it is accessible if it is equally hard to use for those with disabilities? [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Events 24 February 2015, “Does Privacy Matter? [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed, holding that the claim for excessive recordkeeping fees failed as a matter of law because ERISA does not require a flat-fee structure as opposed to revenue sharing; “does not require a sole recordkeeper”; and did not require the plans “to search for a recordkeeper willing to take $35 per year per participant” – the amount that plaintiffs alleged would have been reasonable recordkeeping fees. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:55 am by David Cosgrove
” It does not appear that any evidence was uncovered during the raid that would suggest that the purpose of Mr. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by INFORRM
The Remote Family Court – where does transparency fit in? [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[10] The court found that the MPPAA does not require it to grant the motions and permit the withdrawal liability claims to be arbitrated.[11]  First, Judge Goldblatt analyzed the apparent conflict between the MPPAA and the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am by Jan von Hein
A cynical reading of the UN proposal could lead to considering that the prerogative of establishing the applicable law remains with the relevant court, as the fact that the victim may request something does not necessarily mean that the request ought to be granted (Note that paragraph 1 uses “shall” while paragraph 2 uses “may”). [read post]