Search for: "Gaines v. State" Results 7081 - 7100 of 9,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The newest movement, addressing threats to democracy, is gaining traction. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:27 am by Susan Brenner
’ (quoting Pure Power Boot Camp v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Neil Makhija
Supreme Court decisions, and the recent decision in Husted v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am by Colin Murray
  Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am by Colin Murray
  Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:07 am by Candace Milner
Southern States with Jim Crow histories are still relying on moral turpitude laws and the Shelby v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
Umesh Pratapa In the following guest post, Umesh Pratapa takes a look at the state of liability insurance in India. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v… [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]