Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 7081 - 7100 of 76,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2011, 2:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A potential client comes to the legal malpractice practitioner and says that a good medical malpractice case was lost at trial because of errors by their attorney. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Jeff Marcus
I haven't won a grammy or anything but I'm feeling pretty good this morning. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:55 am
So when IPKat friend, Stephanie Bodoni (Bloomberg), alerted her to news of today's decision from the General Court in Fun Factory v OHIM concerning not one, not two, but three balls Merpel was thrilled. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:46 pm by Larry
On the other hand, I can say with certainty that the first decision of the Court of International Trade for 2013 is: [drum roll please] United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S is another of those intellectual property cases that hits the headlines on account of its subject matter rather than because of its intrinsic legal interest -- though it is by no means lacking in legal interest. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:43 am
Monegasque stamps take some licking ...Judgment was delivered today by the General Court in Case T-197/13Monaco v OHIM (not yet available in English, though you can enjoy it in Maltese, Croatian or Estonian if you like). [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
The Board thus found that the DuPont factors of the similarity of the goods, the channels of trade, and classes of purchasers strongly favor a finding of likelihood of confusion.Similarity of the marks/commercial impression: Citing the Federal Circuit’s decision in Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Technically, if goods or services are received, there is a gift if the amount transferred exceeds the value of the goods or services. [read post]
26 May 2014, 11:00 am by Larry
See here and here for prior discussions on this topic.In Blink Design, Inc. v. [read post]