Search for: "Head v State" Results 7081 - 7100 of 14,744
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am by Giles Peaker
R(N) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 799 (Admin) (26 February 2015) [Not on Bailii, we’ve seen a transcript.] [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
First, head over to the interwebs for the story. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm by Don Jacobs
She was the recipient of the Washington State Judge of the Year Award in 2006 by the Washington State Association for Justice, given to her for the important ruling she made in the Clark County civil case of Magana v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm by Don Jacobs
She was the recipient of the Washington State Judge of the Year Award in 2006 by the Washington State Association for Justice, given to her for the important ruling she made in the Clark County civil case of Magana v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am by Robin Shea
What do employers need to know about the Supreme Court’s pregnancy accommodation decision last week in Young v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:23 pm by Ronald Mann
The Court started this Term’s patent day on Tuesday with Commil USA v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:23 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
Merpel is pleased to see that the AC is at last starting to address the crisis in staff relations that has developed in recent years and which has come to a head in recent months. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:35 am by Lyle Denniston
  But if the Court is to decide the case it heard on Monday, Brumfield v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Therefore there is nothing in the analytical literature that states that they can solve the problem. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:01 pm
The dissent further states, "the existing record does not establish whether the particular tests used by plaintiff's medical experts were based on subjective complaints of pain, and defendants should not be precluded from exploring this issue at trial. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm
  The court only needed to consider three cases to determine that preemption did not bar plaintiffs’ claim:  Levine, Maya v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:36 am by Simon Fodden
In Plantagenet Alliance Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] EWHC 1662 (QB), a fascinating judgment, the court explored Richard’s lineage in some considerable detail. [read post]