Search for: "House v. House"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 41,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Currently Housing Benefit would pay 100% of the rent on a 3 bed flat. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:04 am
Open house viewings should not take place. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:46 pm
Section 97 of the Housing Act 1996 As we know from the Law of Property Act 1925 and the later Street v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:04 am
Open house viewings should not take place. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:35 am
He was renting in the private sector and applied for housing benefit. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:35 am
He was renting in the private sector and applied for housing benefit. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:55 pm
The property is a three bed house. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
First, in Estes v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am
Students of the law of criminal confiscation will be aware that in the late 1990s and over the turn of the Millennium the issue of postponing confiscation proceedings generated substantial litigation, leading to apparently contradictory judgments, culminating in the decisions of the House of Lords in R v Soneji ([2005] UKHL 49) and R v Knights ([2005] UKHL 50). [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:26 pm
In Hart v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Wyoming) Blackburn, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
OPM and the unconstitutional conditions argument in Mass v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg cited language from the court’s 2010 decision in Magwood v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:25 pm
In the seminal case of Street v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 3:46 pm
The book is based on a legal brief that Speth, a former dean of the Yale School of the Environment, wrote in support of Juliana v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:11 pm
Colonial Surety Co., v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 8:48 am
Concerns arise about the proportionality of compromising the privacy of all users for investigative purposes, as emphasized by the Supreme Court in the landmark Puttaswamy v Union of India judgement. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 5:59 am
The name of the case is East Longmeadow Management Systems, Inc v. [read post]
