Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 7081 - 7100 of 8,738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 8:57 am by Lawrence Solum
: Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Matters ofIntellectual PropertyGeneral Reporter: Toshiyuki Kono, Fukuoka, JapanChair: Joost Blom, Vancouver, Canada(2) Constitutional Law (IV.B.) [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
"[W]e face a media landscape that would have been almost unrecognizable in 1978. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:42 am by Steve Hall
Bredesen: I think it’s just a matter of I’ve looked at it. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:28 am by South Florida Lawyers
"Anytime you see that in a opinion, you know the judge is just seething at having to do something she really doesn't want to do and thinks is probably wrong.So let's see whose nose is pinched in an uncomfortable manner this week in our world-famous, completely affectionate and surprisingly snark-free 3d DCA Watch:Bradley v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Applying this principle, the Court held that “[i]t does not violate the First Amendment to treat licensees given the privilege of using scarce radio frequencies as proxies for the entire community, obligated to give suitable time and attention to matters of great public concern. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:09 pm by EB-5
First you've got to help your client decide whether he wants to be in the regular EB-5 Program, which doesn't involve a regional center or indirect job creation. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:20 am by PaulKostro
Div. 1958) (stating that “[t]he property owner is only liable if, in clearing the sidewalk, he increases the natural hazard by introducing some new element of danger”). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Global Global – General Don’t align IP strategy with business strategy (IP Think Tank) Welcome to our new site (IP Think Tank) Valuing intangibles to get mainstream board and investor buy-in – is this the way? [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 11:39 am by NL
Ms W defended on the basis that it wasn't a tenancy, there being no rent paid, or that occupation had been temporary pending negotiations for a substantive tenancy agreement. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 11:39 am by NL
Ms W defended on the basis that it wasn't a tenancy, there being no rent paid, or that occupation had been temporary pending negotiations for a substantive tenancy agreement. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:07 am by Andrew Frisch
I must, therefore, perform a fact-intensive inquiry as to each prong of the five-factor test as applied to Hale in order to determine whether the management issue can be decided as a matter of law. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Kelly
It doesn’t matter if you’re retired. [read post]