Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 7,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2008, 4:53 am
The third branch, and least dangerous branch, was not similarly constrained or hobbled.Since Marbury v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
Does the Court's decision in Parents Involved v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:56 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Williams v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
See NLRB v. [read post]
7 May 2025, 7:24 pm
It is marvelous in the ancient sense of a something miraculous, something that causes astonishment, but at the same time something that is dialectical in its marvelous state. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm
”[2] Earlier, in Powell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 5:07 am
V. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
But you'll rarely find another oral argument as philosophical than the one just completed in Baze v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:37 pm
” State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
An example is Ramos v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
[9] · Should corporations be held directly accountable for protecting certain human rights, rather than only indirectly through the nation-state as the traditional bearer of human rights obligations? [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Looking around, we observe a political oligarchy (Congress) seamed with money and celebrity, hardly able to govern, increasingly irrelevant even as it remains at the heart of an old “republican” constitution; passionate demands (our commentators call them “populism”) for more than the state can summon the will or means to provide, from real economic security to dignity and recognition in a fragmented society (our commentators call it “polarization”),… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:22 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
., Sackett v. [read post]
