Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 7081 - 7100 of 22,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2023, 8:39 am by Flupke van den Bogart
The Commission adopted the first set of sector agnostic ESRS in July 2023. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 7:29 pm by Francis Pileggi
  A recent expedited transcript ruling of March 29, 2023, in the Delaware Court of Chancery involving the Fox Corp and Snap, relates to the adoption of officer exculpation amendments to the corporate charter and DGCL § 242 that provide some insights on this new amendment. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:38 am by Jon Hyman
The context in which the policy was adopted and even the issue of whether a rule or policy has been actually adopted are also important in these cases. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:28 am
During this time, what are libraries doing to prepare for the adoption of RDA? [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:29 am by Nathan Koppel
Last term the court ruled that white firefighters in New Haven were unfairly denied promotions because of their race. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
That's not quite true as a factual matter, but even if it were, so what? [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
 This approach was adopted by the High Court in this case and was a matter of common ground and accepted by Mr Justice Birss in Thomas Pink v Victoria's Secret UK Limited [2014] EWHC 2631. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
I doubt we will ever know: and fundamentally it does not matter. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am by Eleonora Rosati
The same approach was adopted in cases like Adidas Solomon in relation to decorative uses.In sum, held the Court, a trade mark with a reputation is something more than a badge of origin: “what matters … is whether a proximity is created between signs that is such as to have an impact on the perception, by the consumer, of the messages communicated by the trade mark for which protection is being sought. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:26 am by Jeff Gamso
This shocking result – urged by a department of the United States that calls itself, without a trace of irony, the Department of Justice – and accepted by a court that emasculates itself by adopting such a rule of judicial impotency – confirms what I have long feared. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The opinion correctly recognizes that although line-drawing with respect to enforcement practices is hard—it is often “more a matter of mindset than any sort of bright-line rule,” as I have argued—lines nevertheless must be drawn.The opinion also recognizes, with admirable candor, that the immigration practice of deferred action, as it has come to be exercised, is hard to square with these norms.Of course, it is entirely conventional for agencies to… [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am by Jorge Miranda
Similarly, when the grounds for a panel are very poor, it makes sense for the exporting party to appoint panelists with no understanding of the subject matter because an utterly confused panelist is more likely to rule either way. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:36 am by Heather Douglas
In October, a jury was selected for the Saadi v Silva matter. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:58 am by Marshall Isaacs
“But isn’t soliciting business a violation of the newly-adopted Rules of Professional Conduct? [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:02 am by Barbara van Schewick
Why it matters: Allowing ISPs to circumvent the net neutrality protections at the point of interconnection would create a known loophole that ISPs have exploited in the past. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 1:34 am by Ivana Kunda
Article 10(3) of the Regulation sets out a timetable for the adoption of different implementing acts, ranging from January 2026 to January 2029. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:41 pm by Mary Wagner
California, in which the Court had allowed a particular warrantless blood draw in a DUI case involving an accident and injury, but had not established the type of “bright line” rule that Wisconsin later adopted. [read post]