Search for: "People v A. M." Results 7081 - 7100 of 14,350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 10:28 am
 But I'm sure that the department would say that that's exactly what they did. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Hannum Conviction for Cyberstalking & Revenge Porn Survives First Amendment Challenge Contacting a Person’s Facebook Friends Isn’t Stalking–People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
I’m not even thinking about the colossal, world-historical failure of Brazil in its semifinal against Germany. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 As for trademark, I'm hard pressed to see likely confusion, but given how expansive the doctrine has become, you might not even need dilution, unless a court sees this as a Rogers v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
I should emphasize that I’m not yet convinced that it’s wrong, however. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
A taxpayer who has $10,000 of federal income taxes withheld from wages and who has a tax liability of $7,500 rejoices at the prospect of a $2,500 refund, but ought not declare, “I’m not paying taxes. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 7:56 am
Moreover, people seek patent protection for a variety of reasons and depending upon one’s reason for patenting, the legal results set out in the Table may simply be irrelevant.( Indeed, for another view of what is meant by patent value, consider the book by Larry M. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:41 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in People v. [read post]