Search for: "People v Word"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 17,915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
(a) The following words or phrases, when used in this Ordinance, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: Applicant shall mean any person or entity that has submitted an application pursuant to this Ordinance. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
(a) The following words or phrases, when used in this Ordinance, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: Applicant shall mean any person or entity that has submitted an application pursuant to this Ordinance. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:20 am
In Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
“People were so upset when I used the word Muslim. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
It does not matter whether that property is abandoned, lost, or unattended—there are no magic words here. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:30 am
The case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm
In Lachaux -v- Lachaux [2017] EWHC 385 (Fam) Mr Justice Mostyn considered the guidance in relation to issues between (it transpired) former husband and wife. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
The SABC tried the academic argument in SABC v Masstores to get R7.5 million penalties out of Masstores and rightly failed. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
And it may inhibit one's ability to vary one’s words for different audiences, in ways that stop short of misleading but help build consensus around core values. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
Again, this is under the current laws passed by usurpers, but still, I think something more dramatic than just showing up is going to be necessary if Allan V. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
In 1996, in ProCD v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
Last month, word circulated that Trump was on the verge of signing an executive order that would have devastating consequences for LGBT people, members of minority faiths, women, and people seeking reproductive health care. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
One of those people, notably, was Barack Obama. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
--Notes and Questions --Romer v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:37 pm
Hard to imagine too many people will get worked up about that. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
The notice names one Allan V. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
And the Court so held in an older case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Sex, in other words, is something you are born with. [read post]
