Search for: "R. D. C."
Results 7081 - 7100
of 20,634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2016, 1:43 pm
Brown of the New York office along with Simona Suh, Charles D. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 12:33 pm
C. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:14 pm
The Commission found that “[c]ontinuing net energy metering with NEM customers paying charges for interconnection and paying nonbypassable charges for all electricity consumed from the grid is likely to allow customer-sited renewable DG to continue to grow sustainably. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:47 pm
Previously, the Labor Law, which mirrored the Equal Pay Act, provided that individuals must receive equal pay for equal work unless the employer could show that the differential was based on: a. a seniority system; b. a merit system; c. a system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or d. any factor other than sex. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm
También es importante que sepa cómo protegerse de esos riesgos. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 6:47 am
Griffen filed a grievance, claiming defamation, and asking that the Committee require the lawyer to: “delete his outrageous posting”; and “[R]emove the link to Google results for my name. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
(My fellow Verdict columnist Michael C. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:35 pm
The proposed rulemaking is the most sweeping since 1991 when HHS codified The Common Rule, 45 C. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:50 am
By Lorene D. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:25 am
R. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:39 am
As said by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:39 am
As said by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Compagnie d’assurances générales Kansa Internationale ltée c. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 11:26 am
Arising from a horrific case of revenge porn where the defendant had uploaded to the internet an explicit sexual video of the plaintiff, the Court in Doe v D., 2016 ONSC 541 (CanLII) [Edit: this link should work soon ...], said this about the ability to sue for invasion of privacy: C. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:39 am
R. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:13 pm
C. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:30 pm
” – John C. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:30 am
On January 14, 2016, the Service published the final 4(d) rule and, in doing so, significantly revised the interim 4(d) rule. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:30 am
On January 14, 2016, the Service published the final 4(d) rule and, in doing so, significantly revised the interim 4(d) rule. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:04 am
Thorn/R. [read post]
