Search for: "SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL" Results 7081 - 7100 of 29,241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2019, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
In the case below, we will see how a Louisiana Appellate Court decided that the District Court erred in granting a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
11 May 2019, 3:24 pm by Steve Kalar
 Under Daubert the Court of Appeals acts as a gatekeeper that evaluates the reliability and admissibility of the testimony of expert witnesses in federal court. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:39 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
It explained: "Where a district court acted reasonably in imposing a sentence, this Court must affirm its decision. [read post]
10 May 2019, 2:25 pm by Amy Howe
(Cases involving redistricting are among the narrow set of federal cases with an automatic right of appeal from the three-judge district court to the Supreme Court.) [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm by MOTP
ZB, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION D/B/A AMEGY BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-56775 O P I N I O N Opinion filed May 7, 2019 On Appeal from the 55th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2017-56775. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:59 pm by MOTP
May 7, 2019) (concluding that the trial court did not err in declaring as a matter of law that Carter cannot force Amegy Bank to arbitrate his dispute with the bank).Affirmed as Modified and Opinion filed May 7, 2019.In TheFourteenth Court of AppealsNO. 14-17-00900-CVSTANWYN JAY CARTER, AppellantV.ZB, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION D/B/A AMEGY BANK, AppelleeOn Appeal from the 55th District CourtHarris County, TexasTrial Court Cause No. 2017-56775O P I N I O… [read post]
10 May 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The Illinois Appellate Court on appeal reversed the order that granted the motion for a new trial brought by Corey Steel. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:17 pm by skelly
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit holding that agents for American Family Insurance were ICs and not employees under ERISA. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am by Lev Sugarman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit staying a district court injunction of the Trump administration’s “Remain in Mexico” policy. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am by Peter Margulies
According to the Oxford Dictionary, the second definition of “applies” is “[b]e applicable or relevant. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
--Petitioner challenges her teaching assignment to seven periods of in-school suspension (“ISS”) by the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District (“respondent”).[1]  The appeal must be dismissed.Petitioner is a tenured teacher within respondent’s district. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
--Petitioner challenges her teaching assignment to seven periods of in-school suspension (“ISS”) by the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District (“respondent”).[1]  The appeal must be dismissed.Petitioner is a tenured teacher within respondent’s district. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
--Petitioner challenges her teaching assignment to seven periods of in-school suspension (“ISS”) by the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District (“respondent”).[1]  The appeal must be dismissed.Petitioner is a tenured teacher within respondent’s district. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
--Petitioner challenges her teaching assignment to seven periods of in-school suspension (“ISS”) by the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District (“respondent”).[1]  The appeal must be dismissed.Petitioner is a tenured teacher within respondent’s district. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:17 am by Jani Ihalainen
The marks were initially rejected by both the USPTO and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, which considered that the mark was generic as applied to the relevant services, finally succeeding with the District Court. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:17 am by Jani Ihalainen
The marks were initially rejected by both the USPTO and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, which considered that the mark was generic as applied to the relevant services, finally succeeding with the District Court. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:36 pm by Dennis Crouch
The court explains: The doctrine of equivalents applies only in exceptional cases and is not “simply the second prong of every infringement charge, regularly available to extend protection beyond the scope of the claims. [read post]