Search for: "See v. See" Results 7081 - 7100 of 121,996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2023, 1:41 pm
I could potentially see reasons for doing so, and even if I didn't, I might not think that it was such an egregious violation that it called for bouncing a person entirely from her chosen profession.But issuing a subpoena to get at the underlying records? [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Matrix Law
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 2026 This appeal arises out of a contractual dispute between Ukraine and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc (“the Trustee””), acting on behalf of the Russian Federation (“Russia”). [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am by Florian Mueller
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
In this regard, the Grand Chamber judgment refers to the EU Directive (2019/1937) of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law and the Recommentation (CM/Rec(2014)7) on the protection of whistle-blowers adopted by the Committee of Minister of the Council of Europe on 30 April 2014 (see also here). [read post]