Search for: "State v. L. A. T." Results 7081 - 7100 of 9,948
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
And because “[l]evel of generality is destiny” in law, see Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Lily L Batchelder, Fred T. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:46 am by Rob Robinson
Things Clients Truly Want But Don’t Specify - http://tinyurl.com/3v6794h (Rob Robinson) The Email Admin: Dealing With Blank Email Messages – http://t.co/jM55sud (Mike Rede) Three Reasons Why the Traditional Approach to Backup Persists – http://t.co/KfqpClu (Jerome Wendt) UK: ICO Audit Finds Improvements To Google’s Privacy Policies – http://t.co/6VQpUvK (ICO) UNITIZATION: The Process of Separating Logical Boundaries from Physical Boundaries -… [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
(Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bone Care – Court denies summary judgment in favor of bench trial: Bone Care, Int’l v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:02 am by Lawrence Solum
  And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]