Search for: "State v. Mai"
Results 7081 - 7100
of 133,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Internal policies regarding the sharing of such data with the state should be updated. [read post]
31 May 2010, 12:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 7:52 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
(Asia) VII v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Shareholders relied on Cammer v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Runyon v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:14 am
Wittman v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 10:20 pm
(Orin Kerr) Interesting facts from State v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 11:09 am
May 10, 2010). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 2:42 pm
Green v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:46 am
Supreme Court has granted cert in E.M.A. ex rel Plyler v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:15 am
Sheppard v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:50 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:59 pm
May 15, 2007) Ed. note: Funny thing about the blogosphere -- news gets old fast. [read post]
