Search for: "State v. Parks" Results 7081 - 7100 of 11,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 1:20 pm by ---------------------------------
In its decision, released on March 22, 2011, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ruling by the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) which found that a man who was mauled while feeding the bears for his employer may collect workers’ compensation even though he smoked pot beforehand.The case, Hopkins v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The first  was on The State of Creativity: The Future of 3D Printing, 4D Printing and Augmented Reality. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Ainsworth argued that it was permitted to structure Allen’s employment as best served its purposes, and that it could decide to do so as a constructive dismissal: Park v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:10 pm by Stephen D. Richman
Oakhurst Dairy While the Cammelleri case dealt with a mere parking ticket, in 2018, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in O’Connor v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Robert Kreisman
United States Illinois Appellate Court Resolves Breach of Lease Agreement Because of Damage to Property       [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
South Korea A court has dismissed a defamation suit filed by President Park against South Korean politician accused of praising North Korea at ta [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 2:35 am by Sheppard Mullin
These wage deduction categories have been narrowly construed by state courts and the New York State Department of Labor (“NYSDOL”), and employers are currently prohibited from making deductions for, among other things, gym membership dues, purchases at employer cafeterias, parking passes, or day care expenses. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 8 February, the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Grove Park Developments v The Mauritius Revenue Authority & Anor. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm by Elie Mystal
Because it seems judges on the Maryland Court of Appeals are getting into the game.A reader dug up a case from this summer involving whether or not the state met the burden of proof necessary to show that a pot smoker “possessed” a blunt he wasn’t physically holding at the time.The court ruled that he did, and analogized the situation to a Cheech and Chong movie.I’m not sure if it was the decision or the dated reference which enraged the other side, but the… [read post]