Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 7081 - 7100 of 57,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by Florian Mueller
In the old days, people sometimes bought games because of appealing box designs, but threw them away after an hour or so of playing.If impulse purchases were banned, and with Apple having made it pretty much impossible to make serious money on iOS with in-game advertising, the business model might shift to subscriptions--which Apple would probably even prefer.That said, it definitely is interesting when a federal judge dealing with a case like Epic v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Even assuming plaintiff had been the firm's client, she failed to show how such alleged malpractice caused her injury, as the agreement simply effectuated the intent of the parties, i.e., to provide plaintiff with an annuity during her lifetime subject to the stated terms and conditions (see Finova Capital Corp. v Berger, 18 AD3d 256 [2005]; cf. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:00 pm
Innis, supra, at 301 (officer's subjective intent to incriminate not determinative of whether "interrogation" occurred); United States v. [read post]
Abortion policy is now in the hands of the states following the US Supreme Court’s Friday decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
   The crucial evidence was that of Ms Barber concerning her state of mind when she wrote the words complained of. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
On the facts, said the court, the policy had been followed. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am by Andree Blumstein
Andrée Sophia Blumstein is the solicitor general of Tennessee, which joined an amicus brief with 19 other states in support of the challenger in Janus v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:44 am by charley foster
Via FindLaw (contains link to decision) - In an action by native Hawaiians contending that the trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, a Hawaii state agency that administered a portion of a public trust's proceeds, breached the trust, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) alleged violations of state laws regarding the management and disposition of funds were not necessarily breaches, under federal law, of the trust itself; and 2) nothing in the trust's… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am by Jon Sands
But that was before the Supreme Court decided Walker v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:28 pm by Thomas Heintzman
  Yes, the Ontario Court of Appeal recently said in Federation Insurance Co. of Canada v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
The Attorney General pressed that point in an amicus brief for the United States filed in Brown v. [read post]