Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 7101 - 7120 of 40,589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am by Stephen Page
Factor 2 is that the trustee should be independent. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:17 am
They were recordedinternally by the Georgia Department of Corrections as a secret officialrecord of the executions.Today, we will hear 2 of the recordings. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:21 pm
Jang, 2008 BCSC 1372, 63 C.P.C. (6th) 291, where Hinkson J. made the following comments: [32]           Second, [the plaintiff] places her financial position against that of ICBC, as opposed to that of the defendants. [33]           While I accept that it is likely that most drivers in British Columbia are insured by ICBC, the wording of subrule 37B does not… [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:55 am
The district court also easily found that the commonality requirement of Rule 23(a)(2) had been satisfied because the “common nucleus of operative fact” involved defendant’s “standardized conduct” of allegedly “printing of receipts in violation of FACTA. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:26 am by Micah Gates, RWS, WDTN
In Tinklenberg, the Court had to interpret two provisions of the Speedy Trial Act, which requires dismissal if a trial or plea does not commence within 70 days. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:11 pm
  It's definitely going to lose.And lose it does. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:56 pm by Ken
This afternoon I saw that attorney Morgan Pietz — who represents the John Doe defendant in the case in which Judge Wright has been issuing orders — filed an opposition to an ex parte application for relief filed by lawyers (and subjects of Judge Wright's order) John Steele, Paul Hansmeier, and Paul Duffy, as well as paralegal Angela Van Den Hemel. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:55 pm by Jamie Markham
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. (1) A general objection with no request for a voir dire does not preserve the defendant’s right to appellate review of a motion to suppress. (2) The trial court did not err by denying codefendants’ motions to dismiss when, viewed in the light most favorable to the State, there was substantial evidence of each… [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 1:34 am
Gonzales that a state felony conviction for simple drug possession does not qualify as an "aggravated felony" for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 3:18 pm
As 43 governors and two-thirds of the Senate hope the President reconsiders his SCHIP veto, the NYT does a nice job exploring how individuals may be affected by recent shrinkage of the SCHIP program: In South Jersey, Syeeba Palmer, a widow, earns too much to qualify for Medicaid coverage for her children, ages 2 and 5, because she receives $2,800 a month from her late husband's Social Security. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
Given that class action litigation can implicate core aspects of the defendant’s product lines or business practices or policies, effective partnering between inside and outside counsel is indispensable to ensure that the conduct of the litigation itself does not impair the ability of the company to continue to do business with as little disruption as possible. [read post]