Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 5:39 am
Second, the Smith/Rock slap will get more airtime, an Oprah or Netflix special, and more commentary than the brave Ukrainian people of Mariupol defending democracy for the world, and that stinks.Third, the slap and the F-bombs were shown to the entire world, presumably even in Russia, Venezuela, and North Korea, but not in the United States, where censors deemed the American Public needed to be protected from the slap. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Plaintiff in this action sought a declaration that the Defendants' failure to consider and appoint female candidate on the eligible list established from a civil service examination for the position of juvenile counselor with the New York City Administration for Children's Services (ACS) violated the State and City Human Rights Laws (Executive Law §296[1][a]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 8-107[1][a]). [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Town of Orchard Park, 356 F.3d 365, the Circuit Court explained "[w]hen a defendant voluntarily ceases conduct that a plaintiff alleges to be unlawful, the plaintiff’s case usually becomes moot if 'the defendant can demonstrate that (1) there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged violation will recur and (2) interim relief or events have completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged violation.'" Agreeing… [read post]
5 May 2013, 6:38 am
His Wife, who had apparently supported the M-T-F gender change, subsequently became incapacitated. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:08 pm
As such, it appears that the only way jurisdiction over foreign corporations can now exist in Pennsylvania is when the corporate defendant is “at home” here in Pennsylvania. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:12 am
Thomas Sullins, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: Office of the State Public Defender: Diane Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am
Does 1-20, 807 F.3d 908 (8th Circuit 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit considered a case in which a plaintiff filed a complaint identifying the defendants only by internet protocol ("IP") address that had downloaded a film using Bittorent. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 2:10 pm
Fowler, 216 F.3d 459, 460-61 (5th Cir. 2000), receipt requires downloading during a discrete moment in time. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 am
Insurance Co, of the State of PA, ____ F.3rd ___, 2013 WL 1975660 C.A.5 (Tex), 2013. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:51 am
., 369 F. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Plaintiff in this action sought a declaration that the Defendants' failure to consider and appoint female candidate on the eligible list established from a civil service examination for the position of juvenile counselor with the New York City Administration for Children's Services (ACS) violated the State and City Human Rights Laws (Executive Law §296[1][a]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 8-107[1][a]). [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:44 am
Goldstein, 914 F.3d 200 (3d Cir. 2019). [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
City of New York, 850 F.3d 79. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:52 am
., 807 F.3d 785 (6th Cir. 2015), by contrast, the defendant sent identical emails to each of the plaintiff’s 22 customers to inform them that defendant would be taking over plaintiff’s responsibilities. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:29 pm
As part of the factual basis for his appeal, he admitted to facts that established the elements of all three charges.The presentence report's guidelines calculation included two two-level enhancements that applied only "[i]f the defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:11 am
The defendant was responsible for conduct that was (1) reasonably foreseeable; and (2) or was jointly undertaken or agreed to. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 9:24 am
Sessions, 887 F.3d 693, 707 (4th Cir. 2018). [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 10:11 am
., 821 F.3d 634 (5th Cir. 2016). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
Burke, 414 F.3d 305, 321 (2d Cir. 2005). [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 3:41 pm
" … [C]ounsel for the plaintiffs filed a Rule 26(f) report in February 2019 stating that "[t]he Court's Initial Discovery Protocols apply in this case and these disclosures will be served by March 25, 2019. [read post]
