Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General" Results 7101 - 7120 of 21,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2020, 8:11 am by Ambrosio Rodriguez
Since the bill of rights is meant to protect individuals from the actions of government officials, free speech generally does not extend to private places. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:17 am by Aaron
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
The following Privy Council judgments are awaited: Romeo Cannonier & Ors v The Queen (St Christopher & Nevis) and Romeo Cannonier v The Queen (St Christopher & Nevis), heard 13 May 2010 The Public Service Appeal Board v Omar Maraj (Trinidad & Tobago), heard 5 October 2010 Tasarruf Mevduati Sigorta Fonu v Merrill Lynch Bank and Trust Company (Cayman) Limited & Others, heard 31 January – 1 February 2011 Curtis Francis Warren and Others… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 5:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
An agency’s thresholds of significance does not relieve it of its duty to consider evidence under the fair argument standard, nor does conformity with a general plan insulate a project from CEQA review. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:22 pm
FURTHER UPDATE: Attorneys in the Boomediene v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am by Jim Baker
The attorney general’s perspective on encryption is far from universal. [read post]
The possible consequences of such errors include (1) violating payor policies or requirements, leading to allegations of fraud, (2) Medicaid payment holds and referral to state Medicaid fraud control units (state attorneys general), and (3) liability for overpayments, including liability under the False Claims Act for improper retention of overpayments. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Ontario (Attorney General), 2018 ONCA 761 (38921) Is a ward-reduced municipal election constitutional. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:00 am
It does not turn on the subjective belief of the defendant, nor on the subjective intentions of the officer. [read post]