Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 7101 - 7120 of 8,637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:34 pm by David Kravets
We argued that under California law, the public has a right to see the documents that led San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Clifford V. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:05 am by SOIssues
His name did not appear during a search of Delaware Superior Court and Court of Common Pleas records. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:54 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
  The Ontario Superior Court did certify a class proceedings on waiver of tort in 2009 in the ongoing case of Robinson v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:54 am by Daniel E. Cummins
"Reviewing the caselaw cited by the defense in its moving papers, the Pike County court agreed that both the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and the federal courts have held that debris on the roadway that originated from, or were caused by, a vehicle to come upon the roadway did not trigger coverage.More specifically, in the case of Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:25 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or she is… [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:53 am by Business Law Post
The court noted that it was not their job to consider the wisdom or efficacy of that law or whether it is superior to other alternatives; rather, it is for the legislature alone to determine whether the statute was necessary. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Adam Wagner
This does not necessarily entail a right to access confidential Government information. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
  It is worth noting that in the recent United States Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]