Search for: "FIRST MERIT"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 32,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Since OT03, the Supreme Court has released an average of four opinions during the first week of the April sitting and two each during the second and third weeks of the sitting. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 am
appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
We find no merit to this issue. 2. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:47 am
(Or, more to the point, will those who like the decision offer the first, while its opponents offer the latter?) [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:40 am
Keremelevski will be precluded from filing any further documents in this Court without leave first obtained from a justice of the Court in chambers. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:57 am
In the case at bar, Defendants have failed to meet their initial burden of presenting admissible evidence to show that either one or more elements of Plaintiff's first cause of action cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense to that cause of action. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 3:53 am
It isn’t his first complaint about the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 7:59 am
The decision went on to discuss the ability of an arbitrator to Rule on liability issues when they have not been previously disposed of by a trial on the merits. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:53 am
Fact is, a "frivolous lawsuit" means a lawsuit without legal merit or factual merit. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
In Murthy, the facts remained contested and, even assuming they were true, they had to add up to a likelihood, not a mere possibility, of success on the merits. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am
First, the court quickly determines that plaintiffs do indeed have standing. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm
(Or, Why A Feminist Thinks Section 33 Does Matter)” I said, “Whatever merits it might have, dressed up as a means to represent the will of the people against the follies of unelected courts, recourse to section 33 may actually legitimate the continuation of prejudice. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:32 am
In addition, the reasoning of the judge or judges in the first instance can be thoroughly reviewed on appeal. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:30 pm
" Under the 10th Circuit's rule, it should merit 1st Amendment review as well. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 10:51 am
A nice line about the bizarre argument that the First Amendment somehow protects state entities from having to obey the state constitution: The Universities mistake interests grounded in the First Amendment—including their interests in selecting student bodies—with First Amendment rights. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 7:34 pm
The proposed changes will give examiners more time overall, more time for a first action on the merits, and time for examiner-initiated interviews, while decreasing credits on requests for continued examination (RCEs) and providing consistent credits for transferred or inherited amendments. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:32 pm
The First Amendment argument has some merit because of the Supreme Court's penchant for sharing principles between patent and copyright law. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
In addition, the case represents an example of the unresolved legal issue of whether online actions merit the same protections as offline forms of protected speech. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:14 pm
But even courts that allow such permanent injunctions agree: An injunction issued before such an adjudication on the merits is a clearly unconstitutional "prior restraint," and violates the First Amendment. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 3:48 pm
First, I prefer to file these Requests as separate, stand alone documents. [read post]
