Search for: "Fail v. State" Results 7101 - 7120 of 66,290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2022, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Texas (state may not prohibit homosexual acts between consenting adults), Mapp v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:19 pm by Caitlin Lentz
  Here is an example of when a deactivation v. revocation may be proper: If you surrender a state license because you no longer wish to practice in that state (which we would likely counsel against), then that could potentially lead to deactivation. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
Steve Bannon’s criminal trial is scheduled to begin on July 18, more than nine months after he failed to appear in response to the House’s subpoena. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This paper explores the role which Member State-led infringement proceedings can play in overcoming the EU’s rule of law crisis, and hypotheses that it can prove helpful in breaking the current impasse. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:00 am by Christoph Schmon
However, the Court failed to set out parameters to help platforms decide when and when not to block content. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:15 am by fjhinojosa
Brie Sherwin’s article Pride and Prejudice and Administrative Zombies: How Economic Woes, Outdated Environmental Regulations, and State Exceptionalism Failed Flint, Michigan is cited in the following article: Marissa Jackson Sow, Whiteness as Contract, 78 Wash. [read post]