Search for: "In Interest of Doe"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 135,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
The 2-1 ruling from the Eighth Circuit panel held, contrary to the seemingly settled practice in the Supreme Court and other federal appellate courts, that Section 2 of the VRA does not itself confer on private plaintiffs the right to sue defendants who are alleged to be violating the law. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
Congress can tell you anything they want, but the real reason is because they assume that if you are above the median income level, you can afford to be in the Chapter 13 plan for a greater length of time (so that you end up paying more in interest). [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:53 am
Obviously some other transaction(s) have taken place, and the RIAA lawyers -- having attended law school -- knew that it is impossible, which means that they once again knew that they were signing a false document when they signed the amended corporate disclosure statement.It would be interesting to know what kind of transaction actually took place at Capitol Records that the RIAA is trying to conceal from the defendants' lawyers. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:11 pm
If you have been charged with several crimes, it is in your best interest to consult a criminal defense specialist. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
Congress can tell you anything they want, but the real reason is because they assume that if you are above the median income level, you can afford to be in the Chapter 13 plan for a greater length of time (so that you end up paying more in interest). [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
And if so, does that mean that a state really could abolish marriage for everyone? [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:53 pm
An interesting decision came out of New York recently. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 10:03 am
Bainbridge argues:The trouble with the foregoing, of course, is that it equates the public interest with so-called public interest law. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The third claim for mismanagement does not survive [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The third claim for mismanagement does not survive [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:47 am
If a party does not own something that it is trying to enforce, there is no interest in that item. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 1:19 pm
” The Crandon Church cannot file a lawsuit to obtain an interest in property that it does not own. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
When asking (as part of the warning letter) does not work, normally such protections must be sought through a motion to disqualify (for a representation involving pending litigation) or an injunctive action (when there is no pending litigation). [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:15 am
Before it does, I urge you to read a great article in this month’s issue of Arizona Attorney Magazine. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:48 pm
Though the decision does not affect the president’s ultimate power to order divestiture, the decision could have a significant impact on the manner in which CFIUS reviews proceed in the future. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:05 am
But ... these generalized interests are insufficient. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 9:08 am
Because DHS does not have unilateral authority to cancel a Notice to Appear once removal proceedings have commenced, DHS’ motion to terminate constituted a request that the Immigration Judge exercise his authority to terminate the proceedings. ... [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:26 pm
The Doctors have shown they are substantially likely to prevail on their claim that S.B. 95 does not meet this standard. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
Does not this create a liberty interest? [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:00 pm
Because the Due Process Clause does nothing but circumscribe the universe of state laws that can be constitutionally applied to a given case, we “need not . . . balance the competing interests of California and [other states]. [read post]
