Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 8,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
-Dickinson Law 2.00 $96,321 $48,200 Pennsylvania State Univ. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:49 pm
The answer is no, for reasons explained by Justice Alito in his four-member dissent in Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:43 am
For example, he wrote a powerful concurrence in Preterm Cleveland v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
The court therefore concluded that the benefit of suppression would be marginal or nonexistent and that the evidence was admissible under the good-faith rule of United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
But the Act imposes current burdens and must be justified by current needs.Besides Section 5 discriminates among the states.The Act also differentiates between the States, despite our historic tradition that all the States enjoy "equal sovereignty. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 11:33 am
The arguments against the former, especially in Roper v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 pm
The case decided today, Jesner v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm
State Bar of Nevada are the place to start. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 6:49 am
That decision, in Abood v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm
On 17 January 2018, Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland ([2017] EWHC 3368 (QB)). [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:16 am
This follows from Justice Kennedy’s opinion for the Supreme Court in City of Boerne v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Kennedy, Sonia Sotomayor, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, a few years ago in Arlington v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Randy Kennedy at Harvard Law, one of the nation’s most eminent African-American law professors (and a liberal to boot) has been prominent in explaining and relying on that distinction. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Agri Processor v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 5:29 pm
Carey v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
§§636(b)(1)(A)–(B); United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:56 am
As Jay noted here, Holder v. [read post]
