Search for: "People v Word"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 17,915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm
” In 1987, the Texas Supreme Court ruled in El Chico Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
For example, in Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:54 am
In other words, the one-bite rule is no longer relevant. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 1:18 pm
Gutman) and Roma people (Ms. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
Not about warm and fuzzy words and feelings. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It appears that Georgia attorneys representing injured people may have to give up on direct attacks on the state adoption of Daubert, and do the harder work in each case of beating defense Daubert motions and making offensive use of Daubert against defense expert. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
In People v Dietze (75 NY2d 47 [1989]), this Court struck down a similar harassment statute, former Penal Law § 240.25, which prohibited the use of abusive or obscene language with the intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:21 am
Many people think Roubini will be proved right yet again. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:24 pm
When those words are considered in the context of the vouchers' purpose, reimbursing Assembly Members for their actual traveling expenses, as provided in the New York Constitution, or for their actual and necessary transportation expenses, as provided in Legislative Law, and in the context of the evidence before the grand jury concerning what the defendant knew about how the cars he drove and the expenses of operating them were paid for, the grand jury could subject the words to a… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
" In other words, we like all the people protected by the circumcism ban, so if we hated Jews, we would allow them to continue to be circumcised. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:32 pm
Supreme Court case, Rent a Center v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:00 am
Many people, lawyers and non-lawyers alike, write the words “without prejudice” on all their correspondence in the hope (presumably) that they will act as some kind of Harry Potteresque invisibility cloak to stop their words being thrown back at them in court. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] How a state dentistry board hounded non-dentist teeth-whiteners out of North Carolina
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Today, I’ll talk about the details of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am
In Matal v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:36 am
Ty v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Smith v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:10 am
The second argument on Monday was in Obduskey v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
