Search for: "Reproductive Rights" Results 7101 - 7120 of 8,491
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2010, 1:01 am by Cian Murphy
Related PostsAugust 20, 2010 -- Anniversary Blognival: Hanafin on Human Rights & Reproduction (0)May 20, 2010 -- Right to Learn: Thornton on Teaching Terrorism (1) [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:37 am by Laura Orr
If the photographer is no longer living, the rights in the photograph are determined by the photographer’s will or passed as personal property by the applicable laws of intestate succession.There may be situations in which the reproduction of a photograph may be a “fair use” under the copyright law. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 11:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
I have also received the endorsements of organizations that stand for our shared principles, including those protecting women's reproductive health (NARAL Pro-Choice NY and Planned Parenthood of NYC Action Fund), our environment (NY League of Conservation Voters), the rights of the LGBT community (Empire State Pride Agenda, Stonewall and Jim Owles Liberal Democratic Clubs), and workers' rights (32 BJ SEIU, CSEA and many other leaders of organized… [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:55 pm by Michael Atkins
Gasper’s right of publicity claim as the unauthorized reproduction of his performance on the DVDs. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:11 pm by lmcclain
” Like a number of other states, moreover, California has taken steps to encourage and facilitate parenthood by gay men and lesbians (including making the parental rights and responsibilities of domestic partners the same as married parents, allowing second parent adoption and the use of assisted reproductive technology, and enforcing child support obligations against a nonbiological parent in a same-sex couple), thus undercutting the argument that optimal childrearing… [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:11 pm by Kenneth Anderson
 I tend to think Gelinas is right — hail Gelinas, as Judge Posner said — but no matter what, she is a superbly clear writer. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:14 am by AdamSmith1776
We are, of course, one of the quintessential service industries, so this is easy:  We sell knowledge, and knowledge classically lends itself to digitization and zero-marginal-cost reproduction. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Not really strict right now properly understood: fair use, even though the burden is on the defendant. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Alternative access: this is a human rights issue. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:34 pm by Justin Walsh
Johnson writing, “The complementary nature of the sexes and the unique procreative capacity of one man and one woman as a reproductive unit provide one obvious and nonarbitrary basis for recognizing such marriage. [read post]
We applaud the 1st District Court of Appeal's decision affirming the fundamental right of pregnant women to make their own medical decisions. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We’ve confounded the derivative right with the reproduction right. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:45 pm by Howard Knopf
There is no doubt that, for the seller, this is an important objective, one which also benefits copyright holders through reproduction and performance rights. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any other interpretation would, as Dastar feared, create a species of perpetual copyright—if in this case only limited to pure reproductions. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:56 am
What they wanted to know was: "(i) Can the storing and subsequent printing out of a text extract from an article in a daily newspaper, consisting of a search word and the five preceding and five subsequent words, be regarded as acts of reproduction which are protected (see Article 2 of the Infosoc Directive [Directive 2001/29 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, here])? [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:42 pm by tom
However, if the terms of use said something like: “the site is only to be used for personal use” or “reproduction or display of any material from the site is prohibited” or “scraping content from this site is not allowed,” I’m probably in hot water. 2. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:27 am by Connie Crosby
Access Copyright’s third tariff proposal related to the royalties that should be paid by provincial and territorial governments for the reproduction of protected works. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Glenn Cohen
Indeed as I , Lori Andrews, and others have argued in the context of reproductive services, in some ways the “coercion” or “exploitation” concerns that are sometimes raised in anti-commodificationist arguments may be more worrisome in the altruistic and familial setting than in arm’s length market arrangements. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:16 pm by Richard Storrow
If so, “Eggsploitation” may unwittingly be playing into the hands of the religious right. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 4:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
SEPTA alleges: Defendants' use of copy, variation, reproduction, simulation or colorable imitation of the SEPTA registered marks infringes upon SEPTA's rights in its federally registered trademarks, is likely to cause (or has already caused) confusion, mistake, or deception regarding the origin of the services offered by Defendants, and constitutes trademark infringement, in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]