Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 41,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2021, 7:03 pm
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
Apparently, the government never exercises its power to dismiss meritless qui tam cases. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
Apparently, the government never exercises its power to dismiss meritless qui tam cases. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 2:38 am
467/08, Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE), a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona (Spain). [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:34 am
Hence the Contracts Clause of Article V of the Constitution, which prohibited states from interfering with the obligation to pay debts. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:34 am
Hence the Contracts Clause of Article V of the Constitution, which prohibited states from interfering with the obligation to pay debts. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:50 pm
After nearly ninety minutes of oral arguments today in King v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:40 am
The third case in the trilogy of securities antitrust immunity, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:52 am
UPDATE 7: Here's Hollingsworth v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:07 am
The Court of Appeals has ruled that the NAACP may proceed with a lawsuit against the State of Connecticut in claiming that the state violates the one-man-one-vote principle in counting incarcerated individuals as residing in the district where their prison is located rather than the district on which they presently reside.The case is NAACP v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
” Ruthann Robson of Constitutional Law Prof Blog notes that “[w]ithout much fanfare, President Obama signed into law the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010, intended to cure the defects of the previous [animal cruelty] law, held unconstitutional last April in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 5:56 am
Recall Hawaii's gay marriage case, Baehr v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:44 am
In two closely-watched enforcement actions pending in Colorado state court, the Administrator of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code for the State of Colorado is employing the “true lender” theory and the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:19 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:21 am
Under Youngstown v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:50 am
United States), and the power of a judge, after dismissing jurors in a case, to recall the jury for further deliberation (Dietz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 10:19 am
State Farm Ins. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm
Something we have the power to do. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:10 pm
Nussbaum filed the suit, Kaye v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:01 am
In Williams v. [read post]
