Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
“Discovery,” as it is known in the United States, does not exist in Europe. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of the… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:17 am
Specifically, for “intentional or willful” violations, the United States is liable for “actual damages. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
It largely adopts the reasoning of United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Luminant Generating Co., LLC, v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:17 pm
"In the United States, there is no definite requirement for post-market surveillance for defibrillators and heart valves, artificial hearts and so forth," he said. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:17 pm
"In the United States, there is no definite requirement for post-market surveillance for defibrillators and heart valves, artificial hearts and so forth," he said. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 12:58 am
The general message from the most recent reports is that while some areas have improved, the overall quality of health care in the United States is suboptimal. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
He wrote well-known dissents in several previous cases striking down congressional laws on federalism grounds, including United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
At any given short-term moment, however, the United States often seems to me--a simple country boy from Canada--a remarkably badly run country with a horribly outdated governance model. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
The Supreme Court issued an important decision, Vartelas v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:07 am
The first is the Supreme Court’s opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:58 pm
United States, which seeks review of an interesting takings case out of the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:23 am
It largely adopts the reasoning of United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court said in 1895, in Coffin v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am
United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992). [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
Chamber of Commerce's lawsuit against the NLRB, Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:20 am
United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
In SEC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:06 am
" US. v. [read post]
