Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
” 15 The remaining “lesser” or “non-core” factors included the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the putative employer, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. 16 The 2021 IC Rule further provided that it was “highly unlikely” that these non-core factors could outweigh the combined probative value of the core factors. 17 The Final Rule rescinds… [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of California 2013). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:36 am
Lyon (United States as a necessary party). * U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 3:04 pm
In one of them filed in the Southern District of California on November 6, 2015, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:19 am
The Takings Clause of Article V of the United States Constitution states that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:15 pm
By way of background, the United States Supreme Court has held, in the landmark case Garcetti v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
” She wrote: [C]ell phones are ill suited to prevent the type of contraband that might be present on a cell phone from entering into the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Three years ago, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
Many clients and lawyers from outside of the United States are shocked and frightened by our system of extensive document exchange and discovery. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 3:08 am
The granted issue in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
State, 281 Cal. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:18 pm
United States, an Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) case. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:25 am
S. 134 (1972), Kramer v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
The California Supreme Court doesn't feel that issue's sufficiently important to grant review.But the United States Supreme Court does. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
Guglielmino v McKee Foods Corporation, No. 05-16144 (9th Cir. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
United States “may have opened up a big can of worms. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
In the first decision of its kind in the Ninth Circuit, Judge Charles Breyer of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Seyfarth’s early motion to deny class certification under Rule 23 (before any discovery) [here] thereby killing the copycat class action. [read post]
23 May 2020, 3:35 pm
To hold otherwise -- as the high courts in New York, California, Connecticut, Georgia and several other States have done -- is not only to misread Jones v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 3:35 pm
To hold otherwise -- as the high courts in New York, California, Connecticut, Georgia and several other States have done -- is not only to misread Jones v. [read post]
