Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
” Jacobellis v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 2:31 pm
Supreme Court, including last term's unanimous Kansas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:57 pm
Lawyers for two same-sex couples in Utah who wish to marry and a married same-sex Utah couple seeking to have the state recognize their marriage in Iowa will be filing papers in the Supreme Court urging review of the new appeal by state officials in the case of Herbert v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 11:24 am
Martin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:06 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California recently signed an order on a stipulation (pdf) in Murphy v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:57 pm
Supreme Court in the 2010 case of Morrison v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:11 pm
In a partial victory for California workers, the State's highest court ruled, in Salas v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
California. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:11 am
In a partial victory for California workers, the State’s highest court ruled, in Salas v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:11 am
In a partial victory for California workers, the State’s highest court ruled, in Salas v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:54 pm
Apple v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:57 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
. ********************************* It is generally recognized that construction defect cases are some of the most expensive, and complicated, cases being litigated in California. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 11:48 am
(Tamar Davis Larsen, et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:13 am
Fortunately for Apple, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, while aware of what the media reported, will (have to) rule on a different basis.I don't disagree with Apple philosophically. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 11:26 am
A recent opinion from the California Court of Appeals perhaps illustrates the extent to which defendants have been emboldened by the United States Supreme Court's decision striking down personal jurisdiction in Daimler AG v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
California, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that police must first obtain a warrant to search the contents of someone’s cell phone in all but the most extraordinary circumstances. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am
Although a few specialized statutes (like the FECA provision at issue in California Medical) provide for certification, the three most common examples of certifications by federal courts are: (1) certifications of questions of state law to state courts of last resort (which is irrelevant for present purposes, since Article III doesn’t bind state courts); (2) certifications of otherwise unappealable interlocutory questions under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
